Effects of the selective AMPA modulator NBI-1065845 on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel in healthy adults.

This parallel-arm, phase I study investigated the potential cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A induction effect of NBI-1065845 (TAK-653), an investigational α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor potentiator in phase II development for major depressive disorder. The midazolam treatment arm received the sensitive CYP3A substrate midazolam on Day 1, followed by NBI-1065845 alone on Days 5-13; on Day 14, NBI-1065845 was administered with midazolam, then NBI-1065845 alone on Day 15. The oral contraceptive treatment arm received ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel on Day 1, then NBI-1065845 alone on Days 5-13; on Day 14, NBI-1065845 was administered with ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel, then NBI-1065845 alone on Days 15-17. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. The midazolam treatment arm comprised 14 men and 4 women, of whom 16 completed the study. Sixteen of the 17 healthy women completed the oral contraceptive treatment arm. After multiple daily doses of NBI-1065845, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval) for maximum observed concentration were: midazolam, 0.94 (0.79-1.13); ethinyl estradiol, 1.00 (0.87-1.15); and levonorgestrel, 0.99 (0.87-1.13). For area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity, the GMRs were as follows: midazolam, 0.88 (0.78-0.98); and ethinyl estradiol, 1.01 (0.88-1.15). For levonorgestrel, the GMR for AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was 0.87 (0.78-0.96). These findings indicate that NBI-1065845 is not a CYP3A inducer and support its administration with CYP3A substrates. NBI-1065845 was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observed after coadministration of midazolam, ethinyl estradiol, or levonorgestrel.

Assessment of the Effects of Abrocitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Probe Substrates of Cytochrome P450 1A2, 2B6 and 2C19 Enzymes and Hormonal Oral Contraceptives in Healthy Individuals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abrocitinib is an oral small-molecule Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In vitro studies indicated that abrocitinib is a weak time-dependent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19/3A and a weak inducer of CYP1A2/2B6/2C19/3A. To assess the potential effect of abrocitinib on concomitant medications, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies were conducted for abrocitinib with sensitive probe substrates of these CYP enzymes. The impact of abrocitinib on hormonal oral contraceptives (ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel), as substrates of CYP3A and important concomitant medications for female patients, was also evaluated. METHODS: Three Phase 1 DDI studies were performed to assess the impact of abrocitinib 200 mg once daily (QD) on the probe substrates of: (1) 1A2 (caffeine), 2B6 (efavirenz) and 2C19 (omeprazole) in a cocktail study; (2) 3A (midazolam); and (3) 3A (oral contraceptives). RESULTS: After multiple doses of abrocitinib 200 mg QD, there is a lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, efavirenz and contraceptives. Abrocitinib increased the area under the concentration time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of omeprazole by approximately 189 and 134%, respectively. Abrocitinib increased the AUCinf of caffeine by 40% with lack of effect on Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, abrocitinib is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C19. Caution should be exercised when using abrocitinib concomitantly with narrow therapeutic index medicines that are primarily metabolized by CYP2C19 enzyme. Abrocitinib is a mild inhibitor of CYP1A2; however, the impact is not clinically relevant, and no general dose adjustment is recommended for CYP1A2 substrates. Abrocitinib does not inhibit CYP3A or induce CYP1A2/2B6/2C19/3A and does not affect the pharmacokinetics of contraceptives. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration IDs: NCT03647670, NCT05067439, NCT03662516.

Validation of 24-hour trough concentration as a proxy for intensive pharmacokinetic measurements for a combined oral contraceptive pill containing desogestrel.

OBJECTIVES: To confirm that 24-hour steady-state trough measurements (C24) are high-quality proxies for gold standard pharmacokinetic measurements (area under the curve [AUC]) of a combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a 12-sample, 24-hour pharmacokinetic study in healthy reproductive-age females taking a COCP containing 0.15-mg desogestrel (DSG) and 30-µg ethinyl estradiol (EE). As DSG is a pro-drug for etonogestrel (ENG), we calculated correlations between steady-state C24 and 24-hour AUC values for both ENG and EE. RESULTS: Among 19 participants at steady state, C24 measurements were highly correlated with AUC for both ENG (r = 0.93; 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and EE (r = 0.87; 95% CI 0.68-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state 24-hour trough concentrations are high-quality proxies for gold standard pharmacokinetics of a DSG-containing COCP. IMPLICATIONS: Use of single-time trough concentration measurements at steady state provides excellent surrogate results for gold standard AUC values for both DSG and EE among COCP users. These findings support that large studies exploring interindividual variability in COCP pharmacokinetics can avoid the time- and resource-intensive costs associated with measuring AUC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05002738.

Effects of rimegepant 75 mg daily on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate in healthy female participants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of single and multiple doses of rimegepant 75 mg dose on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol (EE)/norgestimate (NGM) in healthy females of childbearing potential or non-menopausal females with tubal ligation. BACKGROUND: Females of childbearing age experience the highest prevalence of migraine and frequently inquire about the concomitant use of anti-migraine medications and contraceptives. Rimegepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, demonstrated efficacy and safety for treating an acute migraine attack and preventing migraine. METHODS: This open-label, single-center, phase 1, drug-drug interaction study explored the effects of rimegepant 75 mg daily dose on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing EE/NGM 0.035 mg/0.25 mg in healthy females of childbearing potential or non-menopausal females with tubal ligation. During cycles 1 and 2, participants received EE/NGM once daily for 21 days followed by placebo tablets with inactive ingredients for 7 days. Rimegepant was administered during only cycle 2 for 8 days, from days 12 through 19. The primary endpoint was the effect of single and multiple doses of rimegepant on the pharmacokinetics of EE and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of NGM, at steady state, including area under the concentration-time curve for 1 dosing interval (AUC0-τ,ss ) and maximum observed concentration (Css[max] ). RESULTS: The study enrolled 25 participants, with pharmacokinetic data assessed for 20 participants. A single 75 mg dose of rimegepant co-administered with EE/NGM increased exposures of EE and NGMN by ≤16% (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 1.03; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.06; and GMR, 1.16; 90% CI, 1.13-1.20, respectively). After 8 days of co-administering EE/NGM with rimegepant, EE pharmacokinetic parameters, AUC0-τ,ss and Css(max) , increased by 20% (GMR, 1.20; 90% CI, 1.16-1.25) and 34% (GMR, 1.34; 90% CI, 1.23-1.46), respectively, and NGMN pharmacokinetic parameters increased by 46% (GMR, 1.46; 90% CI, 1.39-1.52) and 40% (GMR, 1.40; 90% CI, 1.30-1.51), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified modest elevations in overall EE and NGMN exposures after multiple doses of rimegepant, but these elevations are unlikely to be clinically relevant in healthy females with migraine.

Pharmacological and metabolic effects of drospirenone as a progestin-only pill compared to combined formulations with estrogen.

The spironolactone derivative drospirenone is combined with ethinylestradiol or estetrol in combined oral contraceptives. Formulations with 17-ß-estradiol are used to treat climacteric symptoms. A drospirenone-only formulation has been introduced for contraception. Here, the pharmacological properties of drospirenone, the impact of the different formulations on metabolic and laboratory parameters, and the resulting clinical implications are reviewed. Ethinylestradiol, an inhibitor of CYP metabolic enzymes, changes the pharmacokinetics of drospirenone, leading to a higher drospirenone exposure with ethinylestradiol/drospirenone compared to the drospirenone-only preparation. In addition, several metabolic alterations have been described. The impact of estetrol is less pronounced, and for 17-ß-estradiol/drospirenone and drospirenone-only, decreased triglyceride and cholesterol levels were observed. Ethinylestradiol induces various pro-coagulatory factors, leading to hypercoagulability. The effect is significantly reduced with estetrol, and no influence was observed with the drospirenone-only preparation. The anti-mineralocorticoid activity of drospirenone seems to positively counteract the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system-activating action of ethinylestradiol. There is no influence on blood pressure with ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and estetrol/drospirenone formulations, while in clinical trials, a reduction has been observed with 17-ß-estradiol/drospirenone and drospirenone-only. Anti-aldosterone activity via non-renal mineralocorticoid receptors is associated with cardiovascular health, while interactions with parathyroid hormone signaling impact bone structure and vascular calcification. Though the clinical relevance is unclear for drospirenone, data in this context are reviewed. To sum up, the advantages of drospirenone in hormonal contraception and treatment of menopausal symptoms have been demonstrated for all the formulations described here. Combination with estrogen confers benefits and risks, which must be considered.

Lack of Effect of Cenerimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator, on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive.

Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator, is in development for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, a disease mainly affecting women of childbearing potential. The effect of cenerimod on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC, 100 µg levonorgestrel and 20 µg ethinylestradiol (EE)) was investigated. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was performed in 24 healthy male and female subjects. A single oral dose of COC was administered alone and after 35 days of once daily (o.d.) administration of cenerimod 0.5 (n = 10) or 4 (n = 14) mg. Exposure to EE alone or in combination with cenerimod was comparable as reflected by the geometric mean ratios and the respective 90% confidence intervals, while a slight increase in exposure (approximately 10-25%) to levonorgestrel was observed at clinically relevant concentrations of cenerimod. Overall, COC alone or in combination with cenerimod was safe and well tolerated. Two subjects reported one adverse event each (one headache after COC alone, and gastroenteritis in combination with cenerimod 4 mg). In conclusion, cenerimod does not affect the PK of levonorgestrel or EE to a clinically relevant extent. Therefore, COC can be selected as method of contraception during and after cenerimod therapy without the risk of interaction.

Determining the Exposure Threshold for Levonorgestrel Efficacy Using an Integrated Model Based Meta-Analysis Approach.

Combined oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used hormonal contraceptives for the prevention of unintended pregnancies in United States. They consist of a progestin (e.g., levonorgestrel (LNG)) and an estrogen component, typically ethinyl estradiol (EE). In addition to adherence issues, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and obesity (women with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) are prime suspects for decreased LNG efficacy. Therefore, we developed an integrated physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling and model-based meta-analysis approach to determine LNG's efficacy threshold concentrations and to evaluate the impact of DDIs and obesity on the efficacy of LNG-containing hormonal contraceptives (HCs). Based on this approach, co-administration of strong CYP3A4 inducers and LNG-containing HCs (LNG150: LNG 150 µg + EE 30 µg and LNG100: LNG 100 µg + EE 20 µg) resulted in a predicted clinically relevant decrease of LNG plasma exposure (women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 : 50-65%; obese women: 70-75%). Following administration of LNG150 or LNG100 in the presence of a CYP3A4 inducer, there was an increase in mean Pearl Index of 1.2-1.30 and 1.80-2.10, respectively, in women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (incidence rate ratios (IRRs): 1.7-2.2), whereas it ranged from 1.6-1.80 and 2.40-2.85 in obese women (IRR: 2.2-3.0), respectively. Our results suggest that the use of backup or alternate methods of contraception is not necessarily required for oral LNG + EE formulations except within circumstances of both obesity and strong CYP3A4 inducer concomitance following administration of LNG100.

Effects of Lemborexant on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptives: Results From a Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study in Healthy Females.

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in multiple countries including the United States, Canada, and Japan for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As women of childbearing potential may be prescribed insomnia drugs, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted. This single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study examined potential drug-drug interactions between lemborexant and an oral contraceptive (OC) in healthy females (18-44 years, n = 20). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of lemborexant 10 mg (at steady state) on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of OC (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 1.5 mg norethindrone acetate), assess the effect of a single dose of OC on lemborexant pharmacokinetics, and evaluate safety and tolerability of lemborexant and OC coadministration. Ethinyl estradiol maximum plasma drug concentration was not altered by lemborexant coadministration; area under the curve from zero time to the last quantifiable concentration was slightly increased, by 13%. No clinically relevant effects on norethindrone acetate pharmacokinetics were observed. Coadministration of OC with lemborexant had no clinically relevant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lemborexant. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile. These results support the conclusion that lemborexant and OC can be coadministered without dose adjustment.

Quantitative Assessment of Levonorgestrel Binding Partner Interplay and Drug-Drug Interactions Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Levonorgestrel (LNG) is the active moiety in many hormonal contraceptive formulations. It is typically coformulated with ethinyl estradiol (EE) to decrease intermenstrual bleeding. Due to its widespread use and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, there is concern regarding drug-drug interactions (DDIs), particularly a suboptimal LNG exposure when co-administered with CYP3A4 inducers, potentially leading to unintended pregnancies. The goal of this analysis was to determine the impact of DDIs on the systemic exposure of LNG. To this end, we developed and verified a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for LNG in PK-Sim (version 8.0) accounting for the impact of EE and body mass index (BMI) on LNG's binding to sex-hormone binding globulin. Model parameters were optimized following intravenous and oral administration of 0.09 mg LNG. The combined LNG-EE PBPK model was verified regarding CYP3A4-mediated interaction by comparing to published clinical DDI study data with carbamazepine, rifampicin, and efavirenz (CYP3A4 inducers). Once verified, the model was applied to predict systemic LNG exposure in normal BMI and obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) with and without co-administration of itraconazole (competitive CYP3A4 inhibitor) and clarithromycin (mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitor). Total and free LNG exposures, when co-administered with EE, decreased 2-fold in the presence of rifampin, whereas they increased 1.5-fold in the presence of itraconazole. Although changes in total and unbound exposure were decreased in obese women compared with normal BMI women, the relative impact of DDIs on LNG exposure was similar between both groups.

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives with oral or subdermal administration route.

OBJECTIVE: To compare systemic exposure to levonorgestrel (LNG) released from commercially available intrauterine systems (IUSs), a subdermal implant, and oral contraceptives. METHODS: An integrated population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis of data from over 3400 individuals in ten clinical studies with six different LNG-releasing contraceptives (four long-acting reversible contraceptives [LARCs: LNG-IUS 8, 12, and 20, initially releasing LNG 14, 17.5, and 20 µg/day, a subdermal implant initially releasing LNG 100 µg/day according to label]; progestin-only pill [POP: LNG 30 µg/day]; and combined oral contraceptive [COC] pill [LNG 100 µg/day and ethinylestradiol 20 µg/day]), was conducted to generate a popPK model. LNG release rates, and total and unbound serum/plasma LNG concentrations with LARCs were estimated over the indicated period of use; maximum (Cmax) and average (Cav) serum LNG concentrations were estimated at steady state for oral contraceptives. Influence of body weight on LNG PK was also investigated. RESULTS: Serum LNG concentration with LARCs increased with increasing daily LNG release rate, being lowest with LNG-IUS 8, higher with LNG-IUS 12 and LNG-IUS 20, and highest with the subdermal implant (1.7-2.1-times that with LNG-IUS 20). Compared with early serum LNG concentrations with LNG-IUS 20, Cav and Cmax were 1.7- and 4.5-fold higher with POP, and 8.6- and 18-fold higher with COC. Total LNG bioavailability was >97% for the LNG-IUSs and 66-80% with other contraceptives. Serum/plasma LNG concentrations decreased with increasing body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Among the contraceptives examined, COC had the highest and LNG-IUSs the lowest systemic exposure to LNG. Systemic LNG concentration was inversely correlated to body weight.

Evaluation of the Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Vixotrigine and an Oral Contraceptive.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vixotrigine is a voltage- and use-dependent sodium channel blocker in development for neuropathic pain management. This study evaluated the effect of coadministration of vixotrigine (metabolized primarily via uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases) and an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol (uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase inducer) and levonorgestrel on the pharmacokinetics and safety of all three compounds. METHODS: In this phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence, multiple-dose study, 36 healthy women received oral vixotrigine 150 mg three times daily for 6 days and once on day 7. This was followed by a washout period, days 8-11. The oral contraceptive was administered alone on days 12-25 and with vixotrigine 150 mg three times daily on days 26-32. Serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for the area under the concentration-time curve over 8 h and maximum concentration of vixotrigine co-administered with an oral contraceptive vs vixotrigine alone were 0.85 (0.82-0.89) and 0.91 (0.87-0.96), respectively. The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h and maximum concentration of ethinyl estradiol with vixotrigine vs ethinyl estradiol alone were 0.94 (0.91-0.97) and 0.89 (0.84-0.94), respectively; the ratios for levonorgestrel with vixotrigine vs levonorgestrel alone were 1.06 (0.98-1.16) and 1.05 (0.98-1.13), respectively. No adverse events occurring with vixotrigine alone were deemed related to the study drug by the investigators. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of vixotrigine and an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel had no clinically relevant effect on exposure of all three compounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03324685 (registered 25 October, 2017).

Atogepant Has No Clinically Relevant Effects on the Pharmacokinetics of an Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Female Participants.

The incidence of migraine is higher among women than men and peaks during the reproductive years, when contraceptive medication use is common. Atogepant, a potent, selective antagonist of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor-in development for migraine prevention-is thus likely to be used by women taking oral contraceptives. This phase 1, open-label, single-center, 2-period, fixed-sequence study examined the effect of multiple-dose atogepant 60 mg once daily on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive, ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg and levonorgestrel 0.15 mg (EE/LNG), in healthy postmenopausal or oophorectomized women. For participants in period 1, a single dose of EE/LNG was followed by a 7-day washout. In period 2, atogepant was given once daily on days 1-17; an oral dose of EE/LNG was coadministered with atogepant on day 14. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for EE and LNG were assessed following administration with and without atogepant. Twenty-six participants aged 45-64 years enrolled; 22 completed the study in accordance with the protocol. The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) of LNG was increased by 19% when administered with atogepant. Coadministration of atogepant and a single dose of EE/LNG did not substantially alter the pharmacokinetics of EE; the ∼19% increase in plasma AUC0-∞ of LNG is not anticipated to be clinically significant. Overall, atogepant alone and in combination with EE/LNG was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified.

Effects of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors on combined oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in HIV-positive women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptive (COC) components and prevalence of ovulation in HIV-positive women using ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimens compared to those using regimens previously found not to interact with COCs or not using any antiretrovirals. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cohort pharmacokinetic pilot study comparing the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) in HIV-positive women taking ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimens to those in women using non-ritonavir-containing regimens or no antiretrovirals. Participants received COCs containing LNG/EE 150/30 mcg for 21 days. Beginning day 21, we collected serial blood samples over 72 h. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) of LNG, with secondary outcomes including other LNG pharmacokinetic measures, EE pharmacokinetics and ovulation as measured by serum progesterone. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters of LNG showed a trend toward increased exposure in women on ritonavir. LNG AUClast increased by 32.6% (312±60.9 vs. 243±82.6 ng/mL*h, p=.033, n=5) in women taking ritonavir compared to the control group (n=10). The Cmax (9.68±1.81 vs. 7.62±2.29 ng/mL) and Cmin (4.97±1.15 vs. 3.70±1.29 ng/mL) were also higher in the ritonavir arm. After excluding the inconsistent users (n=2), CL of LNG was reduced in the ritonavir arm (p=.032). EE pharmacokinetic profiles were not different between groups. The progesterone concentrations were similar in women of both groups, and none were consistent with ovulation during the treatment cycle. CONCLUSION: Women on ritonavir showed an approximately 30% increase in LNG exposure but no difference in EE exposure. IMPLICATIONS: The current data suggest that ritonavir does not have a clinically significant impact on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics.

Effect of letermovir on levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol pharmacokinetics
.

OBJECTIVE: Letermovir is an inhibitor of the terminase complex of cytomegalovirus (CMV) used as prophylactic therapy in CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. As the combination oral contraceptive (COC) levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE) may be coadministered in this target transplant population, the effects of letermovir on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LNG and EE were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study conducted in healthy women (18 - 65 years old) of non-childbearing potential (protocol number: MK-8228 035). On day 1 of period 1, participants received a single dose of COC (LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg). Following a 7-day washout, oral letermovir 480 mg was administered once-daily on days 1 - 12 of period 2, with a single dose of COC coadministered on day 8. Blood samples were collected to determine LNG and EE PK, and safety was assessed. RESULTS: The AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for COC + letermovir/COC alone were 1.36 (1.30, 1.43) for LNG and 1.42 (1.32, 1.52) for EE, indicating that letermovir coadministration increased COC exposure. Coadministration had no clinically-meaningful effect on Cmax, tmax, or apparent terminal T1/2 for either LNG or EE. All treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Letermovir coadministration with COC resulted in an increase in LNG and EE exposure in healthy adult women; however, levels were within the established safety margins. There was no decrease in LNG or EE exposure with no apparent risk of contraceptive failure on coadministration of letermovir and COC.
.

Altered pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptives in obesity - multistudy assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of levonorgestrel (LNG)-containing combined oral contraceptives (COCs) in obese women. STUDY DESIGN: We pooled and reanalyzed data from 89 women with different body mass index (BMI) categories from four clinical studies. The LNG and ethinyl estradiol (EE) PKs were analyzed utilizing a zero-order absorption (K0), two-compartment PK model to evaluate key PK parameters in relation to a range of weights, BMI and body surface area (BSA). RESULTS: Increasing of body habitus metrics is correlated with decreasing Cmax (p<.0001) and AUCτ (p<.05) for both LNG and EE, but no correlation was found for Cmin (p≥.17). Increasing weight and BMI were associated with a modest increase (p≤.056) of clearance (CL) and appreciable increases of central volume (V1, p<.05), distribution clearance (CLd, p≤.001) and peripheral volume (V2, p<.0001) for LNG. For EE, increases in CL (p≤.009) were found with greater weight, BMI and BSA. Values of V1, CLd and V2 also increased (p<.0001) in obese subjects. The half-life and steady-state volume were greater among obese women (p<.0001) for both LNG and EE. LNG and EE PK parameters correlated well (p≤.006 for all), indicating that individual subject physiology affected both drugs similarly. CONCLUSIONS: The primary effects of obesity on LNG and EE were a modest increase in CL and a marked increase in distribution parameters. We observed no obesity-related differences in trough LNG and EE concentrations. IMPLICATIONS: This population PK analysis demonstrated reduced systemic exposure to LNG/EE oral contraceptives in obese subjects (Cmax and AUCτ); these particular differences are unlikely to lower contraceptive effectiveness among obese women who are correctly using LNG-containing contraceptives.

The JAK1 Inhibitor Upadacitinib Has No Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Levonorgestrel and Ethinylestradiol: A Study in Healthy Female Subjects.

Upadacitinib is a novel selective oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK) inhibitor being developed for treatment of several inflammatory diseases. Oral contraceptives are anticipated to be a common concomitant medication in the target patient populations. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of multiple doses of upadacitinib on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy female subjects. This phase I, single-center, open-label, 2-period crossover study evaluated the effect of multiple doses of 30 mg once daily extended-release upadacitinib on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (0.03/0.15 mg; administered alone in period 1 and on day 12 of a 14-day regimen of upadacitinib in period 2) in 22 healthy female subjects. The ratios (90% confidence intervals) for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity following administration of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel with upadacitinib compared with administration of ethinylestradiol/ levonorgestrel alone were 0.96 (0.89-1.02) and 1.1 (1.04-1.19), respectively, for ethinylestradiol, and 0.96 (0.87-1.06) and 0.96 (0.85-1.07), respectively, for levonorgestrel. The harmonic mean terminal half-life for ethinylestradiol (7.7 vs 7.0 hours) and levonorgestrel (37.1 vs 33.1 hours) was similar in the presence and absence of upadacitinib. Ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel were bioequivalent in the presence and absence of upadacitinib. Therefore, upadacitinib can be administered concomitantly with oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol or levonorgestrel.

The effect of laquinimod, a novel immuno-modulator in development to treat Huntington disease, on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy young women.

PURPOSE: Laquinimod is an orally dosed immuno-modulator currently under development for Huntington's disease (HD). Preclinical findings suggest potential teratogenicity of laquinimod, thus the reproductive ability of females with HD treated with laquinimod needs to be closely managed. Because combined oral contraceptives (COC) are often used in this context, the pharmacokinetics of COC containing ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) in combination with laquinimod (0.6 mg/day) was evaluated. METHODS: In this randomized, phase-1 single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover drug-drug interaction (DDI) study in 48 healthy premenopausal women, COC were administered in a 28-day regimen of 21 days followed by 7 pill-free days for 4 cycles and laquinimod or placebo was administered for 28 days in cycle 1 and cycle 3 starting 7 days prior to COC administration. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling of laquinimod, EE and LNG were collected on day 21 and day 22 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-dose and multiple times post-dose. RESULTS: The ratio of geometric means and 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-24 and Cmax of EE and LNG with and without laquinimod were all within the bioequivalence range (80 to 125%). Laquinimod pharmacokinetics was consistent with those observed in previous studies. The adverse event profile was in line with the current knowledge on the safety profile of both drugs, with headache as the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION: The combination of COC and laquinimod treatment was found to be safe, tolerable, and devoid of any noticeable pharmacokinetic interaction.

In Vivo Formation of Ethinylestradiol After Intramuscular Administration of Norethisterone Enantate.

It is known that a small fraction of orally administered norethisterone is metabolically converted to ethinylestradiol. This exploratory, open-label, nonrandomized study was conducted to investigate the systemic exposure to ethinylestradiol after intramuscular administration of norethisterone enantate in comparison with the exposure to ethinylestradiol after administration of a standard combined oral contraceptive. Sixteen healthy premenopausal women received an oral contraceptive (ethinylestradiol 30 µg/levonorgestrel 150 µg) once daily for 21 days and-after a 1-week washout period-a single intramuscular dose of 200 mg norethisterone enantate. Blood samples to determine ethinylestradiol in serum were taken over 24 hours after the last dose of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel and over 8 weeks after administration of norethisterone enantate. Oral equivalent doses of ethinylestradiol were estimated based on area under the concentration-time curves. The ethinylestradiol serum concentrations observed after administration of norethisterone enantate were relatively low: The mean maximum concentration was only 32% of the maximum observed after ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (90% confidence interval, 22.5%-44.7%). The maximum oral equivalent dose of ethinylestradiol was markedly lower than 30 µg ethinylestradiol per day (20.3 µg/day; 90% confidence interval, 14.8-28.0 µg/day). The same applied to the average oral equivalent dose of ethinylestradiol for the 8-week postdose interval (4.41 µg/day; 90% confidence interval, 3.57-5.46 µg/day). To conclude, the study results indicate that metabolic conversion of norethisterone to ethinylestradiol also occurs after intramuscular administration of 200 mg norethisterone enantate, but is associated with a lower exposure to ethinylestradiol than the use of a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 µg ethinylestradiol (plus 150 µg levonorgestrel).

Absence of Effect of Intravaginal Miconazole, Clindamycin, Nonoxynol-9, and Tampons on the Pharmacokinetics of an Anastrozole/Levonorgestrel Intravaginal Ring.

A study was performed to investigate the effect of an intravaginally administered antimycotic, an antibiotic, and a spermicide plus the co-usage of tampons on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of levonorgestrel (LNG) and anastrozole (ATZ) administered as an intravaginal ring (IVR) releasing 1050 µg ATZ per day and 40 µg LNG per day. In this parallel-group, randomized, open-label study, healthy premenopausal women received an IVR as the main treatment. Comedications were administered on 3 consecutive evenings during treatment with IVR on days 9-11 (group A, 400 mg miconazole; group B, 100 mg clindamycin; group C, 75 mg nonoxynol-9); tampon co-usage (group D) was performed on days 20-23. The primary PK parameter was the average plasma concentration (Cav,ss ) of ATZ and LNG at defined intervals, mainly prior to, during, and up to 7 days after the start of comedication. Fifty-two subjects were included, and at least 11 subjects per group completed the treatments. Overall, the medications and comedications were safe and well tolerated. Very similar ATZ and LNG plasma levels were observed across all groups. The calculated ratios of Cav,ss confirmed the absence of PK interactions because all relevant point estimates and 90% confidence intervals were within the range of 0.800-1.250, which is typically used in bioequivalence studies. These results demonstrate the absence of PK interactions between ATZ/LNG released from IVR and the tested antibiotic, antimycotic, spermicide, and tampons. Therefore, no restrictions for the use of the IVR are needed to continue the clinical program intended to treat endometriosis symptoms.